PDA

View Full Version : Knight's injury toll



Danny
12-08-2004, 05:55 AM
Is it just bad luck?
By Barry Toohey
August 12, 2004
FOX SPORTS

NEWCASTLE's desperate battle for a playoffs berth is being waged on the back of the worst injury toll in the club's history.

Statistics obtained by The Daily Telegraph show just how deeply the Knights' injury curse has contributed to their current fight for survival.

With four rounds still to play before the playoffs, Newcastle have been forced to use a staggering 32 players this season.

Several weeks ago, the Knights were averaging almost 10 players per round over the course of the season who were unavailable because of injury.

By round 20, that had improved slightly to be hovering around eight.

By comparison, the competition front-running Bulldogs have lost an average of just 1.8 players per round to injury.

Newcastle's injury crisis has progressively worsened since the club won the 2001 premiership.

According to coach Michael Hagan, last season's toll was 40 per cent up on the 2001 figure.

This year, it is even greater.

It has prompted the Knights to commission an independent inquiry into all aspects of their training, medical treatment and recovery practices in a bid to shed light on why the Knights have been so severely affected.

"We had a meeting today to go over the findings of the study," Hagan said.

"There is no simple explanation - more a possible combination of a whole host of things that we'll be looking at more closely.

"It is fair to say that bad luck has also played a significant part as well."

While he has tried to steer clear of offering injuries as the reason why the club finds itself in the position of having to win their remaining four games to guarantee a playoffs position, Hagan claims the statistics don't tell the full story.

"I guess they show the extent of the problems we have faced but just as telling for us is the calibre of the players we haven't had on the field for us," he said.

The most notable is captain Andrew Johns, who has not played since suffering a season-ending knee injury in round three.

But he is not the only big-name casualty.

International secondrower Steve Simpson has also made just three appearances for the club and broke his jaw after finally making a return to the field in round 19 against Brisbane.

Of Newcastle's other stars, Parramatta-bound Timana Tahu has played just eight games and won't play again for the club while fullback Robbie O'Davis has managed just 12 appearances and key forwards Ben Kennedy and Daniel Abraham 12 and eight games respectively.

"That has hurt us more than anything - the fact that we have had so many key players missing for long periods of time," Hagan said.

"It's why it is worse this season than in the past.

"What that also does is put a lot more pressure on your other senior players to carry more of the load."

Only two Knights players - Kurt Gidley and Matthew Kennedy - have played all 20 games this season.

The Daily Telegraph

Monica
12-08-2004, 03:25 PM
Being a Knights fan(atic) I can tell you that it has been torture to watch Newcastle this season! Maybe the amount of players out has to do with the demands on players from not only club but rep duties as well? And with high-profile players out, it puts more pressure on the team - physically, but also perhaps mentally? There must an element of bad luck too I suppose.

Just a few thoughts...
Mon

Micky_Riddell
12-08-2004, 07:14 PM
I realise that knights have had a lot of injuries and bad luck this year but (and i know a lot of ppl always say this) but you cant blame a poor season on injuries. although it certainly has an effect on the teams performance there must b other areas where they are fallin down. many other sides have also had a bad run with injuries over the season. i am a St George fan and they are an example of a team who although many injuries have managed to find themselves 5th with 4 games left. then again they have not lost a player to the standard of Andrew Johns. i would say the one exception would b the bulldogs who seem to hav had a fairly good run of recent concerning injuries

Jim Rancoon
13-08-2004, 08:46 AM
I always think that after a poor season you should sack the coach. The medical staff seem to get off easy, there isn't much accountability for them. Has anyone ever heard of medicos getting the boot because of too many injuries or poor management?

injuryupdate
13-08-2004, 12:36 PM
Definitely there are many cases of medical staff getting sacked at NRL and AFL clubs, although it usually occurs without media publicity. A problem is that there isn't anyone at a football club with "medical" experience other than the medical staff themselves, so it is hard for football administrators to know whether the professionals appointed are doing a good job.

Just as when a team is always losing it is difficult to know whether it is playing staff, recruiting staff or coaching staff who are to blame, when a team has too many injuries, it is difficult to know whether coaching, fitness and/or medical management is/are the problem, or whether it is simply bad luck.

Monica
13-08-2004, 08:39 PM
Really? Is it a constant threat for med teams in sport?

injuryupdate
13-08-2004, 10:22 PM
There is a high correlation between salary and risk of being sacked. The strappers and masseurs who are coming down to training for AFL and NRL teams for $8 per hour are almost never sacked, but now that doctors and physios and fitness gurus can be employed on contracts from $10,000 to $100,000 per year, they are very much accountable. No club wants to be paying high wages to someone in charge of an area where the team consistently seems to get poor results.

The coaches who earn $200,000 to $600,000 per year are even more under the pump of course, but sometimes they will 'blame' support staff for not getting their players on the field enough in order to explain the team's poor results.

It comes with the territory - high wage = poor johb security. I think it is better now to be well paid and risk the sack every now and then compared to the days when a team doctor might get paid nothing but would have the job for life.