injuryupdate
11-10-2006, 03:43 PM
Excellent research reports available at:
http://www.irmrc.unsw.edu.au/Publications/centrereports.asp
HarryK
15-03-2007, 11:26 AM
Insurance on a no-fault basis is all very fine and good, but why do the safer sports have to continue to subsidise those which have a proven higher incidence of injury and payouts?
Looking at a range of 'risky' sports and looking to the Medibank surveys along with the excellent work at UNSW, it is becoming obvious that a new way is needed.
Since the collapse of HIH, non-professional recreational sportsters, have been left to hang somewhat out to dry.
What experience / observations do the forum mebers have. Please let us all know.
Should everyone be required to self-insure with private insurers?
Would better purchasing (ie, lower premiums) be acomplished via peak bodies?
As the government scheme is only a temporary measure, what is the future?
:)
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.0 Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.