Ralph
16-03-2008, 10:21 AM
Here it is,
I broke the thrid metacarpal in my hand after hitting the back of a car with it. Not know it was broken but could easily see the extreme swelling, I put it on ice and went to see a doctor a few weeks later. Before my initial appointment, I began to notice a depressed middle knuckle the more the swelling went down. I went to an orthopedic doctor who gave me x-rays that confirmed a angulated break in my third metacarpal. The doctor said he could return the hand back to its original state, but he would have to place a plate and screws on top of the bone to keep it in place. He insisted that the plate would be so discreate that I wouldn't be able to see it or feel it. As for the knuckle, he explained the shortage was due to the anglated metacarpus, and would also be corrected with the angulation.
After the swelling went down from the surgury, it revealed that the knuckle depression had not changed, and the plate is so bulky, I have trouble even reaching into my pants pocket. As the mobilty in my hand returned, it became s decent, except for my post-op visit back to the doctor was unpleasing visit. He exlpained that the bone was shortened due to the injury and was not for extending it because of how well the bone healed. A second opinion revealed that the bone was shortened 6mm, in ideal range to perform a bone graph. Although the procedure was briefly explained, the downfalls to this were not.
My concerns are:
1: The worst case possibilities to getting the surgery
2: Finding the right dotor to removed plate and perform bone graph (Michigan)
3: Is it worth it?:confused:
I broke the thrid metacarpal in my hand after hitting the back of a car with it. Not know it was broken but could easily see the extreme swelling, I put it on ice and went to see a doctor a few weeks later. Before my initial appointment, I began to notice a depressed middle knuckle the more the swelling went down. I went to an orthopedic doctor who gave me x-rays that confirmed a angulated break in my third metacarpal. The doctor said he could return the hand back to its original state, but he would have to place a plate and screws on top of the bone to keep it in place. He insisted that the plate would be so discreate that I wouldn't be able to see it or feel it. As for the knuckle, he explained the shortage was due to the anglated metacarpus, and would also be corrected with the angulation.
After the swelling went down from the surgury, it revealed that the knuckle depression had not changed, and the plate is so bulky, I have trouble even reaching into my pants pocket. As the mobilty in my hand returned, it became s decent, except for my post-op visit back to the doctor was unpleasing visit. He exlpained that the bone was shortened due to the injury and was not for extending it because of how well the bone healed. A second opinion revealed that the bone was shortened 6mm, in ideal range to perform a bone graph. Although the procedure was briefly explained, the downfalls to this were not.
My concerns are:
1: The worst case possibilities to getting the surgery
2: Finding the right dotor to removed plate and perform bone graph (Michigan)
3: Is it worth it?:confused: