Welcome to the Injury Update Forum.

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    63

    Default Article on diabetes

    Revealed: lifestyle is killing us fast
    By Julie Robotham
    May 15, 2006, SMH

    AUSTRALIA is sitting on a time-bomb of disease and early death, according to the first national survey to examine how quickly diabetes and other health threats linked to obesity and poor lifestyle are taking hold.

    New figures reveal 100,000 people each year develop diabetes - which in turn doubles their chance of dying during the next five years, according to the study of more than 6000 men and women, to be released today by the Health Minister, Tony Abbott.

    Although Australia's diabetes rate was known to be high, the pace of the crisis and the number of people newly affected was a shock, said one of the report's authors, Paul Zimmet, director of the International Diabetes Institute. "It is surprising. 100,000 new cases annually is the population of a small city ? this is the epidemic they didn't see coming," he said.

    The results of the AusDiab study put pressure on the Government to spend more on diabetes prevention. Professor Zimmet said diabetes and its complications would have a huge and growing impact on the health budget, as patients may lose many years of productive life and need intensive treatment for heart disease or dialysis for kidney failure.

    He called for policy-makers and planners to promote opportunities for activity, saying sedentary lifestyle was to blame for many diabetes cases. "Exercise is being engineered out of our lives," he said. "There is clearly a personal issue here in terms of people's behaviour - [healthy] eating, exercising regularly. But there has to be an environment in the community that's conducive to doing that."

    The study, funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, revisited the health of men and women aged 30 and older, whose weight, waist circumference, blood pressure and cholesterol and glucose levels had been measured five years earlier.

    The original AusDiab survey identified a diabetes rate of 7.4 per cent - much of it previously undiagnosed and the vast majority the type 2 variety, which is linked to overweight, inactivity and smoking. As well it identified an additional 16.3 per cent of the population with a form of abnormal glucose metabolism, or "pre-diabetes".

    But the update - which comes after NSW statistics last month showed a quarter of schoolchildren are overweight - paints an even bleaker picture of declining health. It revealed those with pre-diabetes were up to 20 times as likely to have developed full-blown diabetes in the subsequent five years, compared with those with normal blood sugar.

    In diabetes, excess sugar in the blood combines with proteins in many different body tissues, to devastating effect. The process can directly damage the heart, kidneys and eyes, and also attacks the blood vessel walls, leading to poor circulation and amputations.

    The study's co-author, Jonathan Shaw, said the results showed younger adults were gaining weight faster than those in middle age. The average man put on 13 kilograms between the ages of 25 and 50, he said, while women on average gained 14 kilograms.

    A spokeswoman for Mr Abbott said $500 million earmarked for preventive health in last week's budget would assist the early detection of diabetes and other chronic diseases. Medicare funding would also be extended to consultations with dietitians and exercise physiologists, but individuals also needed to take responsibility for their lifestyle.

    "The message is that people really need to watch what they eat and make sure they exercise," the spokeswoman said.


    DIABETES ALERT



    > 100,000 people develop diabetes a year, and 200,000 people move from overweight to obese.

    > More than two-thirds of people who die of heart disease or stroke have evidence of diabetes.

    > Diabetes increases the risk of dying to the same degree as smoking.

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wagga Wagga
    Posts
    91

    Default

    I just finished talking to a group of people who have come to my organisation for rehab and of the 8 in the group 100% were in the obese weight range of the healthy weight range chart. Not one of them was close to being in the overweight range.

    I think i scared them enough with the talk of developing diabetes and damaging other parts of their body if they did not start getting active with an exercise program and begin eating a lot more healthily.

    it is good to see that the media are letting the people of australia know about the detrimental effects of sitting down watching tv or playing computer games.

    Life............................ Be in it.

  3. #3

    Default

    It's good that the media are having a dip, but the government has a lot to answer for. Abbott and Howard still have their heads in the sand, saying that it is all down to "individual responsibility", as if individuals could look after themselves well 10 years ago but now they have collectively slackened off. The government won't give any credit to the argument that they are in a position to make changes to encourage people to be more active. It sounds very much like the government approach to smoking in the 1970s and 1980s when they knew of the dangers of smoking but said it was not for them to regulate and individuals needed to be responsible. 20 years of doing very little with respect to smoking has left a huge extra disease burden and history will repeat itself with respect to obesity unless the government gets cracking.

    The AMA also has a case to answer. Whilst they are one step better than the government in wanting legislative tight controls on junk food advertising and available to kids (which is an essential step), the AMA has a laissez faire attitude to physical activity. They recently stated in a press release that nutrition was far more important than physical activity at fighting obesity and that therefore they didn't see a need to be worried about promoting physical activity. As a major lobby group they should not be slack in this regard - it is equally important to promote good nutrition AND physical activity, and to hammer the government until they do more on both. Unfortunately I suspect that the AMA has a bad history with sports medicine and they don't want to encourage sport or sports medicine for some sort of political reasons. It is hard to take them seriously when they are specifically saying that they do not want to campaign to increase physical activity, and really this is a disgrace for a medical body in the current climate.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •