Interesting debate:
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...921260,00.html
The staff of injury update are not responsible for views of other users posted in this forum.
I think I come down more on the side of "universal ECG tests are not cost-effective and are also likely to result in unacceptably high rates of false-positive results. .. athletes instead (should) be screened through a health questionnaire and physical examination, with an ECG used only as a secondary investigation."
Interesting debate though and well worth the read